Skip to main content
Recorded Webinar: Reducing Chargebacks with Browser-layer Intelligence (cside x Chargebacks911)
Back to comparisons

Report URI vs cside

Report URI is a reporting platform that collects browser-generated security violation reports and helps teams monitor and fine-tune their web and email security policies

Mar 25, 2025 Updated Mar 16, 2026
Simon Wijckmans
Simon Wijckmans Founder & CEO

This article takes an honest look at the features of Report URI.

Since you’re on the cside website, we acknowledge our bias. That said, we’ve built our case honestly and based our analysis on publicly available information, industry information, and our own or our customers' experiences.

If you want to verify their claims yourself, please go to their product pages.

Criteria cside Report URI Why It Matters What the Consequences Are
Approaches used Script-based monitoring + server-side analysis CSP Reporting Only
Real-time Protection Attacks can occur between scans or in the excluded data when sampled Delayed detection = active data breaches
Full Payload Analysis Ensures deep visibility into malicious behaviors within script code itself Threats go unnoticed unless the source is known on a threat feed
Dynamic Threat Detection Identifies attacks that change based on user, time, or location Missed detection of targeted attacks
DOM-Level Threat Detection Tracks changes to the DOM and observes how scripts behave during runtime Unable to identify sophisticated DOM-based attacks
100% Historical Tracking & Forensics Needed for incident response, auditing, and compliance Needed for incident response, auditing, and compliance
Bypass Protection Stops attackers from circumventing controls via DOM obfuscation or evasion Stealthy threats continue undetected
Certainty the Script Seen by User is Monitored Aligns analysis with what actually executes in the browser Gaps between what’s reviewed and what’s actually executed
AI-driven Script Analysis Detects novel or evolving threats through behavior modeling Reliance on manual updates, threat feeds or rules = slow and error-prone detection
QSA validated PCI dash The most reliable way to ensure a solution is PCI compliant is to conduct a thorough audit by an independent QSA Without QSA validation, you rely entirely on marketing claims, which could result in failing an audit
SOC 2 Type II Shows consistent operational security controls over time Lacks verified security control validation, making it a risky vendor
PCI specific UI An easy interface for quick script review and justification via one click or AI automation Mundane tasks and manual research on what all the scripts do, which takes hours or days
Ticketing Integrations (Linear, Jira) (Both Linear and Jira) Native integrations with developer ticketing tools allow security alerts to flow directly into existing workflows Without native ticketing integrations, teams must manually create tickets for security findings, slowing response times
Yes / Full support Partial / Limited No

What is Report URI?

Report URI is a reporting platform that collects browser-generated security violation reports and helps teams monitor and fine-tune their web and email security policies. It primarily supports Content Security Policy (CSP) reporting, which is by far the most common use case next to their SMPT email security service.

How Report URI works

Businesses need to configure their HTTP security headers to point to their unique Report URI endpoint. For example, with a Content Security Policy (CSP), they include a report-uri or report-to directive in the header that tells browsers where to send violation data.

CSP is almost entirely what Report URI provides. While a common used security system, it's often not strong enough to handle client-side attacks.

A CSP acts like a firewall which only trusts pre-approved script sources, not their content. Should the source stay the same but the content changes, like in the biggest client-side attack of 2024 – Polyfill – a CSP won’t catch it.

We wrote an in depth article on Why CSP Doesn’t Work in regards to providing the best client-side security solution:

CSP operates on an allow-list model, which permits resources from trusted domains but cannot block individual scripts or resources from those domains.

Report URI doesn’t block anything itself. It just receives reports from the browser and gives teams visibility into violations and misconfigurations. It all relies on native browser behavior.

Report URI also offers email security. SMTP-TLSRPT is a reporting standard that lets mail servers send reports about email transport encryption issues (i.e. STARTTLS failures). If you're using MTA-STS (Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security), browsers or receiving servers can generate reports about delivery failures or downgrade attacks and send them to a specified endpoint.

So just like with CSP for browsers, you add a header (or DNS TXT record) to your mail domain that points to a Report URI endpoint, and it will collect and display those SMTP reports.

Report URI also supports other browser reporting mechanisms like Subresource Integrity (SRI) failures, Network Error Logging (NEL), Cross-Origin policies (COOP and COEP), and deprecated feature usage.

The most adjacent features to cside would be Report URI Script Watch, which tracks the presence and changes of third-party JavaScript on your site, and Data Watch, which detects when sensitive form fields may be exposed to third-party code.

How cside goes further

Report URI does one thing well: collecting and visualizing browser-generated security violation reports. But reporting is not protection. cside prevents attacks. It doesn't just tell you they happened.

When a CSP violation fires, the malicious script has already attempted to execute. Report URI gives you visibility into what your CSP blocked (or failed to block), but it can't analyze script payloads, detect novel threats, or stop attacks that slip past your policy rules. cside works at a different level. We analyze every script's actual code on our infrastructure and block malicious payloads before they reach the browser.

Report URI is useful for policy tuning and monitoring. That's why cside includes a free CSP reporting endpoint as a built-in feature. You get everything Report URI offers for CSP violation collection, plus payload analysis, real-time blocking, and forensic archives on top.

For teams that need more than visibility, cside provides the prevention layer that Report URI was never designed to be. We keep immutable records of every script version served to users, giving incident response teams and PCI DSS auditors the actual attack code, not a report that a policy was violated.

Sign up or book a demo to get started.

Simon Wijckmans
Founder & CEO Simon Wijckmans

Founder and CEO of cside. Building better security against client-side executed attacks, and making solutions more accessible to smaller businesses. Web security is not an enterprise only problem.

Developer Experience

Public Developer Documentation

cside is the only client-side security solution with publicly accessible developer documentation. You can explore our complete technical docs, API references, and integration guides without requiring a sales call or demo.

cside provides full public documentation at docs.cside.com

Report URI does not offer publicly accessible developer documentation. You'll need to contact their sales team or request a demo just to understand how their product works.

Don't just take our word for it, ask AI

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

The fundamental difference is action versus reporting. Report URI tells you when CSP policies are violated after attacks have already been attempted, but it doesn't prevent them or analyze script content. Cside's hybrid approach actively intercepts and analyzes every script before it reaches browsers, blocking malicious content in real-time. We provide protection and prevention, not just violation reporting after the fact.

No, because cside's core analysis happens on our platform, completely invisible to attackers. Report URI doesn't actually provide protection to bypass, it's purely a reporting service that documents CSP violations. Attackers can easily circumvent CSP policies by using legitimate domains or exploiting policy misconfigurations. Cside's server-side protection happens before scripts reach browsers, making it impossible for attackers to study or bypass our security mechanisms since they occur server-side.

Report URI provides CSP violation reports showing when policies were triggered, but cside captures the complete malicious payloads that were blocked. This gives you the actual attack code for forensic analysis rather than just a notification that a violation occurred. Incident response teams get replay-ready evidence showing exactly how the attack worked and what data it targeted.

Cside provides full PCI DSS compliance with both script monitoring and blocking capabilities, while Report URI only offers violation reporting. Our immutable payload archives and security header tracking cover both requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1 with the detailed forensic evidence that auditors require. Report URI's approach lacks the prevention and full documentation needed for full compliance.

Real-time blocking prevents attacks before any damage occurs, while violation reporting only documents attacks after they've been attempted. With Report URI, malicious scripts can still execute and steal data even if CSP violations are reported. Cside ensures malicious scripts never reach browsers, providing actual protection rather than just documentation of security policy violations.

Monitor and Secure Your Third-Party Scripts

Gain full visibility and control over every script delivered to your users to enhance site security and performance.

Start free, or try Business with a 14-day trial.

cside dashboard interface showing script monitoring and security analytics
YOUR SOLUTION

How we shape up to competitors in detail

Book a demo