WAFs don't perform content analysis of JavaScript files, and especially if the malicious payload originates from a 3rd party URL, the WAF would not live in the flow of the request. They only validate that the HTTP request itself to the web server appears legitimate. When a third-party script gets updated with malicious code, your WAF treats it the same as any other update from that trusted domain. WAFs lack the capability to hash, analyze, or compare script versions to detect when legitimate code becomes compromised, which is exactly how supply chain attacks like Polyfill succeed.
Can cside work alongside my existing WAF without conflicts?
We monitor an entirely different dimension of the application stack; hence, there is no interference.
Does cside's JavaScript proxy add latency like a WAF does to all traffic?
cside only adds 8-20 milliseconds to specific dynamic JavaScript files we proxy, with static scripts cached for faster loading.
How does cside's approach compare to the complexity of managing a WAF?
cside is much simpler because we're only handling JavaScript files, not your entire web infrastructure.
What happens if cside's proxy goes down? Will my website break?
Your website will continue working as intended with our fail-open design and 99.99% uptime SLA.